House · 114th Congress · Session 2 · Roll 617

House vote house-114-2-617

No related bill listed for this roll call.

What is this vote?

Whether the House should end debate and move to the next step

Official question: On Ordering the Previous Question

Date: 12/8/2016

Sources

Provenance for this roll-call record.

Vote date: 12/8/2016

Chamber

House

Data source

Clerk of the House (roll call votes)

Congress / Session

114 / 2

Roll number

617

Record identifier

house-114-2-617

This is the canonical roll-call identifier stored in OurCongress.

Your district

Highlighted members based on your link parameters.

Highlighted

Susan Brooks

Vote: Yea

Highlighted

Larry Bucshon

Vote: Yea

Highlighted

André Carson

Vote: Nay

Highlighted

Luke Messer

Vote: Yea

Highlighted

Todd Rokita

Vote: Yea

Highlighted

Marlin A. Stutzman

Vote: Yea

Highlighted

Peter Visclosky

Vote: Nay

Highlighted

Jackie Walorski

Vote: Yea

Highlighted

Todd Young

Vote: Yea

Tip: Share a link like ?state=CA&district=12 or ?highlight=A000360.

What this vote does

On Ordering the Previous Question Providing for consideration of the Senate amendment to the bill (H.R. 2028) making appropriations for energy and water development and related agencies for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2016, and for other purposes, and providing for consideration of the bill (S. 612) to designate the Federal building No bill link is listed for this roll call in the source feed. Recorded outcome: Passed.

Why this matters

This is an official, on-the-record vote — it’s what members actually did, not a quote or a headline.
Roll-call questions are often procedural. We surface the underlying context so you can follow the legislative steps.
Some roll calls are about procedures or motions that don’t reference a bill directly in the data feed — they can still shape what happens next.
Tip: The official roll-call question text is usually the best clue to what rule or step was in play.