House · 116th Congress · Session 2 · Roll 215

House vote house-116-2-215

No related bill listed for this roll call.

What is this vote?

Whether the House should end debate and move to the next step

Official question: On Ordering the Previous Question

Date: 10/1/2020

Sources

Provenance for this roll-call record.

Vote date: 10/1/2020

Chamber

House

Data source

Clerk of the House (roll call votes)

Congress / Session

116 / 2

Roll number

215

Record identifier

house-116-2-215

This is the canonical roll-call identifier stored in OurCongress.

Your district

Highlighted members based on your link parameters.

Highlighted

Sharice Davids

Vote: Yea

Highlighted

Ron Estes

Vote: Nay

Highlighted

Tracey Mann

Vote: Yea

Highlighted

Roger Marshall

Vote: Nay

Highlighted

Derek Schmidt

Vote: Yea

Highlighted

Steven Watkins

Vote: Nay

Tip: Share a link like ?state=CA&district=12 or ?highlight=A000360.

What this vote does

On Ordering the Previous Question Providing for consideration of the resolution (H.Res. 1153) condemning unwanted, unnecessary medical procedures on individuals without their full, informed consent, and providing for consideration of the resolution (H.Res. 1154) condemning QAnon and rejecting the conspiracy theories it promotes No bill link is listed for this roll call in the source feed. Recorded outcome: Passed.

Why this matters

This is an official, on-the-record vote — it’s what members actually did, not a quote or a headline.
Roll-call questions are often procedural. We surface the underlying context so you can follow the legislative steps.
Some roll calls are about procedures or motions that don’t reference a bill directly in the data feed — they can still shape what happens next.
Tip: The official roll-call question text is usually the best clue to what rule or step was in play.